theram4jc made this template

to whom it may concern

 

About Me

Jeff Watkins
Age: Still alive
Email
Occupation: Too many things
AIM:JeffyJeffW
For sale on Amazon.com
For sale on eBay
Amazon.com Wishlist
My space
My library
My reviews and lists

Previous Posts

My first trip to Austin, Texas!Went to the biggest...
A Piece of Me Has Died
The fucking USPS
Today's Haul


DCFC - The Barsuk Years
Ornette Coleman - "Tomorrow Is The Question!"
Hanging out, pushing buttons
My jazz collection

Blogs I Dig

His beautiful eyes...
Melissa's Journal
Mosaic Life
Morse Coded Signals
Of Folly and of Vice
Resurgence
Theophilus
Unspace
Words Are Not Enough

Soundtrack of my Life

The Appleseed Cast
David Bazan
The Beatles
Brandtson
Johnny Cash
Converge
Alice Cooper
Copeland
Miles Davis
Death Cab For Cutie
Bob Dylan
Ben Kweller
MxPx
Professor Longhair
Pink Floyd
Ramones
Stretch Arm Strong
The Who
Brian Wilson


Pop Culture interests

All Music Guide
Bandoppler
CMJ
Dr. Mohler's Radio Program
Epitonic
Hollywood Jesus
HM
Monsters in the Morning
Paste
relevant
View Askew
XXX Church

Reading the Classics

Christian Classics Ethereal Library
Literature.org
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

archives

January 2002
February 2002
March 2002
April 2002
May 2002
June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
May 2013
July 2013
August 2013
October 2013
April 2014
May 2015


© To Whom It May Concern 2002-2010, except for cited or source material.

 

Thursday, September 20, 2007

A Critical Review of Steven C. Roy's "How Much Does God Foreknow?"

The book, How Much Does God Foreknow? A Comprehensive Biblical Study, is a fantastic work written by Steven C. Roy. An associate professor of pastoral theology, Dr. Roy teaches at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School in Deerfield, Illinois. The central issue of the book delves into the subject of God’s foreknowledge. The discussion regarding this topic deals with the extent to which God has knowledge of future events. The question the author hopes to answer is whether God’s knowledge of what will occur is exhaustive and comprehensive or limited and indeterminate.

Within the first pages of the book, it becomes obvious that Dr. Roy subscribes to an exhaustive view of God’s foreknowledge. He does not limit God in any way, but simply states his opinion in the opening sentence: “God knows the future” (Roy 2006, 9)! The author’s thesis illustrates how God’s omniscience and omnipotence give Him the ability to know what lies ahead. In other words, it would go against God’s all-knowing and all-powerful nature for Him to not already know future events. But, a problem arises in the exhaustive view of God’s foreknowledge and quickly becomes an inquiry that must be answered. The main issue, then, being how can God know the future events of humans if they have free human agency to make choices that will effect a final decision or event? The writer spends a great deal of time making arguments to answer that very question which is raised by a relatively new theological position known as open theism.

Open theism denies the very claim that Roy originally makes, that God does not know the future because it has not occurred yet. The author does a great job of making his claims for why someone should view God’s foreknowledge as meticulously far-reaching as possible. He writes the book so persuasively that all who read it should see the faultiness in trying to understand a God who does not have future knowledge of His free creatures’ actions. The author astutely posits that God does know the actions humans will take, and even more, why they will act and speak in certain ways. Using examples from the Old and New Testaments, the writer shows how God lets people make their own choices, yet He knew before the foundation of the world what those choices would be. As well as presenting biblical evidence for an exhaustive view of God’s foreknowledge, Dr. Roy defines every possible position addressed in the book.

The writer of the text explains what he means when speaking about foreknowledge, as well as fairly assessing what open-theists mean when they speak to the issue God’s limited knowledge. Exhaustive foreknowledge implies an infallible, all-encompassing knowledge that God possess of every thought, action, and event of every human or creature within the realm of every possible outcome that could potentially occur. That is to say, God knows everything before it happens! An open view of God would contend that God cannot know the possible decisions humans will make because they are creatures with libertarian freedom, so how could God know what humans would do if they themselves do not know? Roy’s book really emphasizes both views by comparing and contrasting each of them, showing why one lacks not only a solid biblical reflection, but also a well-reasoned philosophical foundation.

Although open-theists oppose the writer’s orthodox stance, a non-exhaustive view of God also sites biblical precedence for why God does not know future free choices of His creatures. The author examines this kind of argumentation that open theists use to show how God is limited in what he knows. According to open theists, that idea is best represented in several passages contained in the Bible that seem to assert that God repented, recanted, or changed his mind. But brilliantly, in the very next section of the book, the author quickly rebuts those examples and shows that, again using biblical evidence, the text affirms that God does not change his mind or repent or recant.

Dr. Roy helps readers to pinpoint how essential an exhaustive view of God’s foreknowledge is to understanding many things that have happened in human history. Also, the author is quick to recognize the implications that proponents to the openness of God do not take into consideration. While Pinnock, Sanders, Boyd, and others think one way about certain theological instances, the writer calmly and gracefully shows them the road back to orthodoxy. Throughout the text, there are many instances where he illustrates these qualities. This is especially evident in chapter four, where Roy makes the claim for open theism. He examines the view, but notes how inconsistent it is with Scripture, and how poor the argument is hermeneutically. These are just some of the many insights gained from reading the text.

It is an understatement to say that viewing God’s foreknowledge in a particular way will shape one’s view in other areas of theology and ministry. The author understands this, and that is why he spends a great amount of time in the book researching those conclusions one will inevitably come to if he or she lands in the camp of the non-exhaustive view of God. There is a section of the book that is a perfect example of this. In the final chapter, the author looks at the practical implications of open theism and shows how many things will be evident if a person falls into this theological trap. By investigating worship, prayer, and struggling with the issue of evil, as well as others, the author shows why a view of exhaustive foreknowledge is of the uttermost importance for understanding God (as much as humanly possible). As the author expresses, “Exhaustive divine foreknowledge enables a level of expectation and practice that much more closely corresponds to the vision of the Christian life portrayed in Scripture” (Roy 2006, 278).

A novel idea that resonated with me was the discussion of how, according to open-theists, Greek philosophy plays an important role in the way the church understands the philosophical implications tackled in the book. Even though some theologians in the past have been influenced by Platonic or Aristotelian thought, Dr. Roy demonstrates how God’s foreknowledge must be handled strictly with biblical testimony and not philosophical inference. This is not to say that philosophy is absent from the Bible, but that when Scripture verifies something so significant as God’s foreknowledge, it is wise to heed to its underpinnings.

There was nothing within the pages of the book that really challenged the way I viewed God. Since the author and I share the same presuppositions, it would be hard for me to disagree with what he wrote. Dr. Roy is such a convincing writer that while I was reading his review of open-theism, he started to sound like one himself. I believe this example really shows how much he knows the material, because he wrote in such a way that gave good evidence to support the view. In the end, it was his reexamination of the exhaustive claims that really hit home and especially emphasizes the importance of relying strictly on the validity of Scripture.

I enjoyed how the author pointed out positive aspects of open theist’s argumentation instead of just nitpicking particular theological positions. An example of this is found when Roy presents the case for open theism. He highlights doctrine that open theists correctly interpret the Bible to teach. Even though the author’s position on this heated issue is contrary to open theism, he is very careful to treat his challengers with respect, and he still considers them brothers and sisters in the faith. Another aspect of the book that I appreciated quite a bit was how the author soaked this book in biblical basis for every claim he made. A large portion of words in this book are from the Bible; select passages that do not serve as proof text, but rather strong examples of the way our Lord is portrayed in the Bible (as a God who knows all things before anything occurs).

While How Much Does God Foreknow? has many positive aspects, it is not without a few problems. The weaknesses of the book are not so much theological in nature. The contention lies within how the author organizes and structures of the book. From the contents page, it would seem as if the author arranged the book in a logical order. However, when one reads the text, it seems very redundant at times, and topics run over into each section. Although I agree with the author on most of his positions, there are times when the language with which he writes is very passé. I found myself just glazing over the words, not because of their technicality, but because it was just a bit superfluous and boring. This is not necessarily something the author could have fixed in editing, yet he could have wrote with a little more excitement at times.

As Dr. Roy concludes the book, he shares the same sentiment as he did in the introduction: “God knows the future—exhaustively and definitely and infallibly” (Roy 2006, 279)! That is a good place to start and end. God has to know the future. If He is waiting on time like his creation, than we are all in trouble. God has to be beyond time; immutably sovereign while his creatures do their best in their marred state to glorify Him. I would wholeheartedly recommend this book anyone who wanted to know more about the subject of God’s foreknowledge, especially if that person was leaning toward open theism. While the language of the book might be technical for some readers who do not read critically in theology, there is enough practical information for readers to be able to understand what the author is saying.

posted by Jeff Watkins at 1:30 AM

you can post here: [1 comment(s)]

Sunday, September 16, 2007

I Got This Email Tonight

Welcome!

Thank you for registering with the Sanity Score, a service of Psych Central. Your registration gives you access to the full range of free services offered by the Sanity Score, including saving and tracking your score over time. You also have complete access to the services at Psych Central, including our online support community.

Your username is: shawn
Your password is: fuckyou

(Remember, your password is case-sensitive, so type it in exactly as shown or copy and paste it into your Web browser.)

Yours truly,
Dr. John Grohol
Sanity Score
http://www.sanityscore.com/
____________________________________________________________________________________

Now, all I have to do is figure out who is this mysterious Shawn.

posted by Jeff Watkins at 1:40 AM

you can post here: [1 comment(s)]

Monday, September 10, 2007

{politics}

Your Political Profile:

Overall: 75% Conservative, 25% Liberal

Social Issues: 75% Conservative, 25% Liberal

Personal Responsibility: 75% Conservative, 25% Liberal

Fiscal Issues: 50% Conservative, 50% Liberal

Ethics: 75% Conservative, 25% Liberal

Defense and Crime: 100% Conservative, 0% Liberal

posted by Jeff Watkins at 7:13 PM

you can post here: [2 comment(s)]